Flight Safety Information - July 21, 2025 No. 144 In This Issue : Incident: Atlas B744 near Amsterdam on Jul 19th 2025, engine shut down in flight : Incident: Wizz UK A21N near Amsterdam on Jul 20th 2025, smoke in cockpit : Incident: Delta B764 at Los Angeles on Jul 18th 2025, engine fire : .Incident: Republic E175 at Boston on Jul 14th 2025, tail strike on landing : A Delta pilot narrowly avoided a B-52 collision in North Dakota: 'I don't know why they didn't give us a heads up at all' : Pilots ‘switched off wrong engine’ in South Korea crash that killed 179 : EASA Advises Airbus A320neo Pilots on Smoke Risks from LEAP Engines : Hawaiian Airlines 787 Pilots Made Double Diversion to Los Angeles : Wizz Air A321 Pilots Makes Emergency Landing at Amsterdam : FAA to see $2.3B budget boost in FY2026, focus on ATC : Air India jet skids during landing in Mumbai, damaging aircraft and runway : Calendar of Events Incident: Atlas B744 near Amsterdam on Jul 19th 2025, engine shut down in flight An Atlas Air Boeing 747-400 freighter, registration N439GT performing flight 5Y-8153 from Almaty (Kazakhstan) to Amsterdam (Netherlands), was descending towards Amsterdam when the crew reported the failure of the #3 engine (CF6) and shut the engine down. The aircraft continued for a safe landing on Amsterdam's runway 18C, vacated the runway and stopped on the parallel taxiway for an inspection by emergency services before taxiing to the apron. The aircraft is still on the ground in Amsterdam about 28 hours after landing. https://avherald.com/h?article=52a8c627&opt=0 Incident: Wizz UK A21N near Amsterdam on Jul 20th 2025, smoke in cockpit A Wizz Air UK Airbus A321-200N, registration G-WUKP performing flight W9-5390 from Poznan (Poland) to London Luton,EN (UK), was enroute at FL360 about 120nm east of Amsterdam (Netherlands) still in German Airspace when the crew reported smoke in the cockpit and decided to divert to Amsterdam. The aircraft landed safely on Amsterdam's runway 22, stopped on the runway for about 5 minutes for an inspection by emergency services and taxied to the apron. The airline reported a technical issue. The aircraft is still on the ground in Amsterdam about 8 hours after landing. https://avherald.com/h?article=52a8c4bc&opt=0 Incident: Delta B764 at Los Angeles on Jul 18th 2025, engine fire A Delta Airlines Boeing 767-400, registration N836MH performing flight DL-446 from Los Angeles,CA to Atlanta,GA (USA) with 224 people on board, was climbing out of Los Angeles' runway 25R just being handed off to departure when the crew declared emergency reporting a left hand engine (CF6) fire indication. Departure cleared them to maintain whatever altitude they needed, the crew chose 3000 feet. All departures from LAX were halted, the next aircraft already having received takeoff clearance had their takeoff clearance cancelled and rejected takeoff. The aircraft positioned for an approach to Los Angeles' runway 25L and landed safely, engine fire extinguished, about 15 minutes after departure. Runway 25L was temporarily closed after landing. Emergency services inspected the aircraft, which taxied to the apron about 5 minutes after landing. Ground observers reported seeing continuous flames from the left hand engine. The FAA reported: "Delta Air Lines Flight 446 safely landed after returning to Los Angeles International Airport around 2:10 p.m. local time on Friday, July 18 due to a reported engine fire. The Boeing 767-400 was heading to Hartsfield/Jackson Atlanta International Airport. The FAA will investigate. " https://avherald.com/h?article=52a7c5d3&opt=0 .Incident: Republic E175 at Boston on Jul 14th 2025, tail strike on landing A Republic Airways Embraer ERJ-175 on behalf of Delta Airlines, registration N224JQ performing flight DL-5780 from Cincinnati,KY to Boston,MA (USA), landed on Boston's runway 22L, the tail contacted the runway surface however. The aircraft rolled out without further incident and taxied to the apron. The FAA reported: "Republic Airways Flight 5780 experienced a tail strike while landing at Boston Logan International Airport around 6 p.m. local time on Monday, July 14. The aircraft taxied to the gate. The Embraer ERJ-175 departed Cincinnati - Northern Kentucky International Airport. The FAA will investigate." The aircraft remained on the ground for about 24 hours. https://avherald.com/h?article=52a76190&opt=0 A Delta pilot narrowly avoided a B-52 collision in North Dakota: 'I don't know why they didn't give us a heads up at all' A Delta pilot said he avoided a crash with a B-52 bomber after executing an "aggressive maneuver." The Delta flight, which was operated by SkyWest, was headed toward North Dakota. "It caught me by surprise, this is not normal at all," the pilot apologized to passengers. A Delta regional flight traveling from Minneapolis to Minot avoided a mid-air collision with a US Air Force B-52 bomber on Friday. The flight, which was operated by SkyWest Airlines as Delta Connection, was headed toward North Dakota when it encountered a B-52 bomber from Minot Air Force Base. It is unclear how close the two aircraft were to each other when the incident happened. The pilot of SkyWest flight 3788 told passengers that the craft had managed to evade the B-52 after executing an "aggressive maneuver." "I don't know how fast they were going, but they were a lot faster than us, I felt it was the safest thing to do to turn behind it," the pilot said while apologizing to passengers, per a recording of the conversation. "It caught me by surprise, this is not normal at all. I don't know why they didn't give us a heads up, because the Air Force base does have radar," the pilot continued, adding that it was "not a fun day at work." When approached for comment, Delta Air Lines referred Business Insider to SkyWest Airlines. SkyWest said the flight was originally "cleared for approach by the tower but performed a go-around when another aircraft became visible in their flight." It added that the plane had landed safely in Minot and they are "investigating the incident." In January, an American Airlines flight collided with a UH-60 Black Hawk as it neared the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The collision killed all 67 people abroad the two aircraft. Representatives for the US Air Force Central Command, Minot Air Force Base, and the Federal Aviation Administration did not respond to requests for comment from BI. https://www.yahoo.com/news/delta-pilot-narrowly-avoided-b-041926638.html Pilots ‘switched off wrong engine’ in South Korea crash that killed 179 The pilots of the South Korean airliner that crashed and killed 179 people switched off the wrong engine, according to a new report. The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) found that the right engine of the Jeju Air Boeing 737 stopped working after the plane collided with a flock of ducks. Meanwhile, the left engine continued to produce power. However, instead of turning off the damaged engine on the right-hand side, the pilots cut power to the side that was still operational, leaving the plane without any working engines. The investigators said: “A pilot may have mistakenly turned off the engine.” The cockpit voice recorder captured the pilot saying “shut down engine number two”, but the flight data shows that the pilots instead switched off engine number one, likely in error because of the pressure of the situation. An official told South Korea’s MBN television news: “The pilot should have turned off the right engine, which was severely damaged by the bird strike, but he turned off the left engine, which was spinning, and the black box and power went out.” The pilots on the Jeju Air flight had also activated the left engine’s fire extinguisher, which makes it impossible for the engine to be restarted while the aircraft is in flight, the report said. News of the pilots’ role in the Jeju Air crash comes less than a week after it was revealed that the fatal Air India crash in June, which killed all but one of the 242 passengers on board, was also caused by the pilot’s error after he cut off the fuel supply. The South Korean plane, which crashed on Dec 29 2024, hit the ground at a dangerously high speed without its landing gear lowered and exploded after colliding with an embankment at the end of the runway. All 175 passengers and four of the six crew members were killed in South Korea’s worst aviation disaster in decades. The pilots of Flight 2216 had also ignored the correct procedure for how to land after a bird strike by climbing the aircraft back up and then turning it to make a rushed landing in the opposite direction on the same runway. The collision with the birds had occurred as the aircraft was preparing for its descent into Muan International airport, located in the southern part of the country. The airport’s air traffic control issued a warning at 8:57am that there was bird activity detected in the area, and a minute later the pilot reported a bird strike and issued a mayday call. Video footage later showed that the right engine had erupted in flames and the investigation found feathers and duck blood in both engines. ARAIB presented its findings on Saturday, but the families of the victims accused officials of unfairly blaming the pilots at the press conference. The investigators had to quickly retrieve copies of the report, claiming that it had not yet been formally issued. Investigators maintain that there were no engine defects or mechanical failures, although power to the aircraft’s flight recorders was shut off for the last four minutes of the flight, so there could be key information that remains unknown. Kim Yu-jin, the head of the relatives’ group, said: “When investigators take a position, it should be accompanied by documents that support their position and convince the bereaved family that their conclusions are inevitable. We were only given their conclusions. “We have repeatedly asked them to be careful about these disclosures because the way that the results of the investigation are communicated can have an impact on the compensation that families receive.’’ https://www.yahoo.com/news/pilots-switched-off-wrong-engine-082403902.html EASA Advises Airbus A320neo Pilots on Smoke Risks from LEAP Engines In Boeing 737 MAX jets, equipped with CFM Leap-1B engines, such LRD activations have led to smoke incidents requiring immediate pilot response. PARIS— The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has clarified that Airbus A320neo-family aircraft have not experienced load-reduction device (LRD) activations on CFM International Leap-1A engines. However, EASA has issued precautionary guidance to airlines and pilots in response to smoke incidents tied to LRD activation on Boeing 737 MAX aircraft powered by Leap-1B engines. The advisory follows two Boeing 737 MAX smoke events linked to LRD activation at various airports, including Seattle (SEA) and Miami (MIA). EASA urges Airbus A320neo operators to implement interim crew training and preparedness for potential smoke scenarios despite no direct cases yet recorded. EASA on A320neo Smoke Risks The load-reduction device (LRD) is a safety mechanism designed to reduce structural loads on engines when significant fan imbalance occurs, such as from blade damage. While this feature protects the engine, its activation can inadvertently create a pathway for oil leakage into the compressor. This contaminated oil can infiltrate the aircraft’s bleed air system, resulting in dense smoke inside the cabin and cockpit. In Boeing 737 MAX jets, equipped with CFM Leap-1B engines, such LRD activations have led to smoke incidents requiring immediate pilot response. Although the Airbus A320neo-family, which uses Leap-1A engines, has not encountered LRD activations, EASA is taking a precautionary stance. EASA advises that pilots follow established Quick Reference Handbook (QRH) procedures when facing engine failure or smoke presence. If LRD activation occurs, isolating the affected engine’s bleed system or shutting down the engine can mitigate smoke contamination effectively. Crew Training and Operator Guidance EASA is directing Airbus operators to specifically identify fleet aircraft fitted with Leap engines containing LRDs. Operators must ensure that pilots are informed of the risks and prepared to handle scenarios involving potential LRD activations, especially during severe engine vibrations or damage. Additionally, the agency stresses that these risks should be adequately addressed during pilot conversion training and regular recurrent training sessions. Emphasizing these scenarios in training helps familiarize pilots with the operational challenges posed by smoke events linked to engine structural protections like LRDs. While EASA’s recommendations are interim, comprehensive safety assessments of LRD-related events are underway. Regulatory authorities and manufacturers, including Airbus and CFM International, are evaluating possible design changes to mitigate oil leaks and smoke risks. https://aviationa2z.com/index.php/2025/07/21/easa-advises-airbus-a320neo-pilots-on-smoke-risks/ Hawaiian Airlines 787 Pilots Made Double Diversion to Los Angeles The dual diversion reflects the complexity of modern aircraft systems and the stringent safety measures practiced in commercial aviation. LOS ANGELES— Hawaiian Airlines (HA) flight HA1 from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL), Honolulu, experienced rare consecutive diversions on July 19, 2025. The Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner was forced to return to LAX twice due to technical issues. The scheduled 2,556-mile route from Los Angeles (LAX) to Honolulu (HNL) typically takes just over five hours, but passengers aboard HA1 endured two failed departure attempts before the flight was ultimately canceled. Hawaiian 787 Double Diversion Flight HA1, operated by Hawaiian Airlines’ Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner registered as N780HA, was slated for an 8:30 AM departure from Los Angeles (LAX). The aircraft eventually took off slightly delayed at 9:03 AM, climbing to a cruising altitude of 38,000 feet en route to Honolulu (HNL). About 80 minutes into the journey, a mechanical issue was detected, prompting the pilots to initiate a return to Los Angeles for safety reasons. The first landing occurred at 11:43 AM, nearly 2 hours and 40 minutes after departure. Upon landing, maintenance teams inspected and reportedly resolved the technical problem. After roughly 90 minutes on the ground, the aircraft departed once again at 1:15 PM. However, the issue resurfaced shortly after takeoff. The pilots decided to return to LAX just 15 minutes into the second flight, landing at 1:53 PM. Following the second unscheduled return, Hawaiian Airlines canceled the flight to prevent further complications and to ensure passenger safety. The specific mechanical problem was not publicly detailed, but the airline emphasized adherence to strict safety protocols. The Dreamliner remained grounded at LAX while awaiting further maintenance evaluation. According to the unconfirmed reports, one of the diversions was likely due to a medical emergency onboard. While another is due to some technical issues. Operational Safety and Caution in Aviation The dual diversion reflects the complexity of modern aircraft systems and the stringent safety measures practiced in commercial aviation, OMAAT flagged. While passengers were understandably frustrated by the disruption, the airline’s decisions highlight the precautionary principle prioritized over operational convenience, especially on transoceanic flights. Aircraft systems can sometimes display recurring alerts, even after maintenance interventions. In aviation, these recurring indicators often lead to conservative decision-making, especially when flying over vast oceanic areas where emergency landings are limited. Hawaiian Airlines’ decision to cancel the flight reflects a commitment to ensuring the mechanical integrity of the aircraft before resuming operations. Passenger Experience and Airline Response Although Hawaiian Airlines has not released specifics about the technical fault, affected passengers were rebooked on later flights to Honolulu (HNL). The airline also provided necessary assistance, including accommodations and rebooking options. Instances of back-to-back diversions, while rare, are not unprecedented. They emphasize the importance of aviation safety culture, where mechanical caution supersedes operational timelines. This case serves as a reminder that while modern aircraft like the Boeing 787-9 are highly advanced, they remain complex machines requiring rigorous maintenance and checks to guarantee passenger safety. Similar Incident Lufthansa (LH) flight LH510 from Frankfurt Airport (FRA) to Buenos Aires (EZE) faced severe disruptions on July 7, 2025, leading to two diversions across South America. The Boeing 747-8, en route to Argentina, first diverted to Asuncion Airport (ASU) and then to São Paulo (GRU), ultimately declaring a mayday due to crew fatigue and fuel shortage before the flight was canceled. Dual Diversions and Emergency Declaration Lufthansa’s flagship ultra-long-haul service, flight LH510, typically covers the 7,133-mile route between Frankfurt (FRA) and Buenos Aires (EZE) in approximately 13 hours. However, adverse weather over Argentina triggered an extended ordeal for passengers and crew. After departing Frankfurt at 10:28 PM, the Boeing 747-8 (registration D-ABYM) encountered deteriorating visibility upon approaching Buenos Aires. Unable to land, the aircraft entered a holding pattern at 7,000 feet, waiting for conditions to improve. With no resolution in sight, the flight diverted 663 miles northeast to Asuncion, Paraguay (ASU), landing safely at 8:00 AM local time after over 14 hours airborne. Following refueling and a brief stop, the aircraft departed Asuncion at 8:56 AM, aiming to reach Buenos Aires once again. However, persistent poor weather conditions forced a second diversion—this time to São Paulo, Brazil (GRU), Lufthansa’s regional hub, 1,069 miles from Buenos Aires. Upon final approach to São Paulo, the flight crew declared a mayday. Air traffic control later confirmed that the declaration cited both crew fatigue and fuel shortage—a highly uncommon combination for emergency calls. The aircraft landed safely at 1:04 PM, roughly 20 hours after its original departure from Germany. Safety Protocols The inclusion of crew fatigue in a mayday call is atypical. While fuel shortages are recognized as valid grounds for an emergency, fatigue is generally managed by adhering to regulated duty time limits. In this case, however, the compounded effects of dual diversions, prolonged holding patterns, and extended duty hours exceeded safe operational thresholds. Aviation safety experts emphasized that ultra-long-haul routes inherently carry greater risks due to limited alternates and unpredictable weather patterns. Once the crew “timed out” under legal duty regulations, Lufthansa canceled the remainder of the flight. Emergency services greeted the aircraft in São Paulo as per standard protocol following a mayday call. Passenger Handling and Aircraft Status Passengers endured nearly a full day aboard before disembarking in São Paulo, where Lufthansa arranged rebookings on alternate flights to Buenos Aires or other final destinations. The airline leveraged its established operations at GRU to manage passenger accommodations and onward travel efficiently. As of the latest reports, the Boeing 747-8 remains grounded in São Paulo. Lufthansa has not specified whether the aircraft will be ferried back to Frankfurt or continue to Argentina for rescheduled operations. This incident underscores the operational challenges airlines face on ultra-long-haul routes, where variables such as weather, crew endurance, and fuel planning converge in complex and dynamic scenarios. https://aviationa2z.com/index.php/2025/07/21/hawaiian-airlines-787-double-diversion-to-los-angeles/ Wizz Air A321 Pilots Makes Emergency Landing at Amsterdam Shortly into the flight, pilots detected smoke in the cockpit, an aviation emergency that requires immediate response due to the risk it poses to flight safety. AMSTERDAM- A Wizz Air (W9) flight from Poznań–Ławica Airport (POZ) to London Luton Airport (LTN) made an emergency landing after the cockpit filled with smoke on July 20, 2025. The incident prompted a Mayday call, leading the aircraft to divert to Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS). The Airbus A321, carrying over 200 passengers, landed safely with no reported injuries. Emergency services, including ambulances and fire trucks, awaited the aircraft upon arrival for immediate inspection and assistance. A Wizz Air (W9) flight from Poznań–Ławica Airport (POZ) to London Luton Airport (LTN) made an emergency landing after the cockpit filled with smoke. Wizz Air Emergency Landing at Amsterdam On Sunday (July 20, 2025), at approximately 11:30 AM local time, Wizz Air flight W9 5390 departed from Poznań–Ławica Henryk Wieniawski Airport (POZ) en route to London Luton Airport (LTN). Shortly into the flight, pilots detected smoke in the cockpit, an aviation emergency that requires immediate response due to the risk it poses to flight safety. The crew promptly declared a Mayday and coordinated with air traffic control to divert to the nearest major airport. Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS), well-equipped for emergencies, was selected. The aircraft landed safely around 20 minutes after the emergency was declared, according to reports from The Sun. Upon landing, a full-scale emergency response was activated. A fleet of emergency vehicles, including fire trucks, ambulances, and a medical helicopter, surrounded the aircraft. The pilots underwent medical checks as a precaution, though no injuries or medical concerns were reported among the crew or passengers. Wizz Air’s Response Authorities at Amsterdam Schiphol began a thorough investigation to determine the cause of the cockpit smoke. As of the latest updates, the exact source remains unidentified. Wizz Air (W6) emphasized that passenger and crew safety is its highest priority. In a statement to BNO News, Wizz Air confirmed that a recovery aircraft was dispatched from London Luton Airport (LTN) to transport the stranded passengers to their intended destination. The airline also issued WIZZ vouchers as compensation and assured passengers were kept informed throughout the process. Wizz Air has reiterated its commitment to stringent safety protocols. The swift action by the pilots and coordination with air traffic controllers ensured that a potentially dangerous situation was managed effectively. The incident underscores the importance of preparedness and efficient crisis management in commercial aviation. While the investigation is ongoing, Wizz Air has pledged full cooperation with aviation authorities to determine the cause and prevent similar occurrences in the future. Similar Incident A British Airways (BA) flight from London Gatwick Airport (LGW) to Cancun International Airport (CUN) made an emergency landing after toxic fumes filled the cabin. The incident occurred on July 16, 2024, shortly after Flight BA2203 departed from LGW, forcing a return under a declared full emergency. The Boeing 777-200 aircraft, operated by British Airways (BA) and carrying 340 passengers, circled London for 45 minutes to burn fuel before landing safely at 3:29 PM. Passengers and crew were exposed to fumes that caused dizziness and nausea. British Airways Flight BA2203 was en route from London Gatwick Airport (LGW) to Cancun International Airport (CUN) when crew members detected a potent and unpleasant odor in the cabin. The Boeing 777-200, registered as G-YMME, had departed at 2:11 PM local time when the smell, described by passengers as similar to “used socks,” began to permeate the aircraft. Cabin crew and passengers quickly reported symptoms including dizziness and nausea. Reacting swiftly, the pilots deployed oxygen masks within the cockpit and opened the windows to improve ventilation. Recognizing the severity, the flight crew declared a “full emergency,” prompting air traffic controllers to prioritize the aircraft’s immediate return. To ensure safe landing conditions, the aircraft remained airborne over London airspace for approximately 45 minutes, burning excess fuel to reach a safer landing weight. British Airways confirmed that the plane landed safely at 3:29 PM, and emergency response teams promptly attended to the aircraft upon its return to LGW. Medical Assistance and Passenger Support Upon landing, medical personnel evaluated several passengers and crew members affected by the fumes. While some required on-site medical attention, there were no reports of serious injuries. British Airways postponed the flight for 24 hours, providing hotel accommodations to all affected passengers. The airline also issued an apology for the disruption, stating: “The aircraft landed safely at Gatwick after our pilots identified a technical issue. Customers disembarked normally, and we’ve apologised for the disruption to their travel plans.” The airline conducted a comprehensive inspection of both the aircraft and the runway to rule out further hazards. The cause of the fumes remains under investigation. https://aviationa2z.com/index.php/2025/07/21/wizz-air-a321-makes-emergency-landing-at-amsterdam/#google_vignette FAA to see $2.3B budget boost in FY2026, focus on ATC The US House Appropriations Committee has approved a $23.3 billion budget for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for fiscal year 2026, marking a significant increase of over $2.3 billion compared to the current year. The funding is part of the broader Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development (THUD) appropriations bill aimed at modernizing the national airspace system and strengthening aviation safety. A key focus of the new budget is air traffic control. The bill allocates $10.368 billion to fully fund ATC operations. It includes funding to hire 2,500 new air traffic controllers. This move addresses ongoing staffing shortages that have already led to increased overtime and added pressure on the current workforce. The new hires are expected to help the air traffic system run more smoothly. Beyond ATC operations, the FAA will receive a record $5 billion for facilities and equipment, marking its largest infrastructure funding to date. This funding should help to maintain and upgrade critical equipment like radar systems, control towers, and other technology needed to manage air traffic. The FAA’s overall operations budget will rise to $13.48 billion, an increase of $269 million from the previous year, though slightly below the administration’s original request. Within this, $379 million is allocated to the Aircraft Certification Service, with a portion dedicated to enhanced inspector training and restoring technical knowledge. Trump plans to ‘radically transform’ ATC system after Newark flight disruptions However, not all areas saw funding increases. Research and development was cut by $50 million to $230 million, while Airport Improvement Program funding remains unchanged at $4 billion. The budget now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers will review it and negotiate their version before reaching a final agreement. https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/faa-to-see-2-3b-budget-boost-in-fy2026-focus-on-atc Air India jet skids during landing in Mumbai, damaging aircraft and runway NEW DELHI (Reuters) -An Air India Airbus A320 flight veered off the runway as it landed during heavy rain at the Mumbai International Airport on Monday, briefly shutting the runway and damaging the underside of one of the plane's engines. All passengers and crew members have since disembarked, Air India said, without saying whether anyone was injured. Air India flight AI2744 had flown from Kochi in southern Kerala state to Mumbai. The Mumbai airport said in a statement there were "minor damages reported to the airport's primary runway" due to what it described as a "runway excursion", and a secondary runway had been activated to ensure operational continuity. The aircraft has been grounded for checks, Air India added. A Times of India report, citing sources, said three tyres had burst on the aircraft after the landing. TV footage from NDTV and India Today showed the outer casing of the engine damaged, with some apparent cracks. Air India has come under intense scrutiny after a Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed in the Indian city of Ahmedabad last month, killing 260 people. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency said earlier this month it plans to investigate its budget airline, Air India Express, after Reuters reported the carrier did not follow a directive to change engine parts of an Airbus A320 in a timely manner and falsified records to show compliance. https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/air-india-jet-skids-during-094332829.html CALENDAR OF EVENTS . Asia Pacific Aviation Safety Seminar 2025; 10-11 September 2025; Manila, Philippines . 2025 PROS IOSA SUMMIT - SEPT 10-11 - Denver, CO · ISASI ANNUAL SEMINAR 2025'September 29, 2025 – October 3, 2025, DENVER, COLORADO . Air Medical Transport Conference (AMTC™) - 2025 – October 27-29th (Omaha, Nebraska) . 29th annual Bombardier Safety Standdown, November 11-13, 2025; Wichita, Kansas · CHC Safety & Quality Summit, 11th – 13th November 2025, Vancouver, BC Canada Curt Lewis