Flight Safety Information - December 31, 2025 No. 258 In This Issue : Incident: Malaysia B738 at Alor Setar on Dec 30th 2025, burst tyre on departure : Incident: Eastern Express B734 at Miami on Dec 29th 2025, blew tyres on landing : Incident: Sun Country B738 at Milwaukee on Dec 29th 2025, tail scrape on departure : Unprepared Viva Pilots Approach JFK, Try To Land On Occupied Runway : Delta Air Lines Apologizes After Flight 2150 Diverts To Atlanta: Pilots Wearing Oxygen Masks On The Flight Deck : Air India 787 Pilots Operated 5 Flights with Snags, DGCA Issues Notice : Latest deep-sea search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 gets underway : Netherlands Tightens Aviation Safety at Amsterdam Schiphol as Alcohol Screening Removes Flight Crew, Impacting European and Transatlantic Travel : Calendar of Events Incident: Malaysia B738 at Alor Setar on Dec 30th 2025, burst tyre on departure A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration 9M-MXH performing flight MH-1209 from Alor Setar to Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), was backtracking runway 04 for departure and stopped while turning around to line up for departure. Malaysia's Civil Aviation Administration (CAAM) reported the aircraft suffered a burst tyre while preparing for departure to Kuala Lumpur. All passengers and crew disembarked safely. The runway was closed for about 3 hours. The aircraft is still on the ground about 9 hours later. https://avherald.com/h?article=531f84af&opt=0 Incident: Eastern Express B734 at Miami on Dec 29th 2025, blew tyres on landing An Eastern Air Express Boeing 737-400, registration N804TJ performing flight BBQ-553 from Varadero (Cuba) to Miami,FL (USA), landed on Miami's runway 30 when the aircraft blew a number of tyres. The aircraft taxied to the apron. The FAA reported unknown damage and stated: "AIRCRAFT BLEW TIRES ON LANDING DAMAGING FUSELAGE, LEFT ENGINE AND LANDING GEAR, MIAMI, FL." The aircraft remained on the ground in Miami for about 21.5 hours, then positioned to Baltimore,MD (USA). https://avherald.com/h?article=531f814c&opt=0 Incident: Sun Country B738 at Milwaukee on Dec 29th 2025, tail scrape on departure A Sun Country Boeing 737-800, registration N851SY performing flight SY-201 from Milwaukee,WI to Orlando,FL (USA), departed Milwaukee's runway 25L at 09:22L (15:22Z) when the tail contacted the runway surface. The aircraft continued the climb, but stopped the climb at FL270 and diverted to Chicago O'Hare,IL (USA) for a safe landing on runway 28C about 40 minutes after departure. The FAA reported minor damage and stated: "AIRCRAFT INCURRED A TAIL STRIKE ON DEPARTURE AND POST FLIGHT INSPECTION REVEALED DAMAGE TO SKID SHOE, MILWAUKEE, WI." The aircraft remained on the ground in Chicago for about 3 hours, then continued the journey to Orlando and continued service. https://avherald.com/h?article=531f7f79&opt=0 Unprepared Viva Pilots Approach JFK, Try To Land On Occupied Runway New York has some of the world’s most congested airspace, so it’s important for pilots to be prepared, brief the approach, etc. Here’s an example of two airline pilots who seemingly approached New York Kennedy Airport (JFK) completely unprepared, in a way that’s rather concerning. I’m not sure if there was the perfect storm of issues that somehow caused the pilots to get into this situation, or if this level of unpreparedness is common at the airline. On the plus side, kudos to the JFK controllers for keeping their calm, and not being jerks, for once! This incident was super embarrassing and concerning Viva A321neo approaches JFK with clueless pilots YouTube channel You can see ATC has air traffic control audio and a visualization of an interaction that happened at JFK on the early afternoon of December 18, 2025, as Viva flight VB100 was approaching the airport, after a roughly 4hr20min flight from Mexico City (MEX). For those not familiar, Viva is a Mexican low cost carrier, and the flight was operated by an Airbus A321neo with the registration code XA-VXR. The Viva plane was landing on runway 13L, and not only is New York airspace complicated, but this is an especially challenging approach, as it requires a last minute turn. But what’s kind of shocking is how you can tell from early on that the pilots clearly hadn’t done their homework, and were just winging it (no pun intended): The approach controller cleared the plane to fly direct ASALT, to cross ASALT at 3,000, and to fly the RNAV Z RWY 13L approach (I understand many people may be not be familiar with the details of this, but the point is that each of those details is important, and should be acknowledged by the pilot) The pilot simply responded by confirming they were cleared for the RNAV runway 13L approach, and didn’t read back that they were supposed to fly direct ASALT The controller reminded the pilot of that, though the pilot had no clue what she was talking about, and then simply responded with “roger,” not actually confirming the details A while later, it was clear the pilot still had no clue what he was supposed to do, so he asked the controller to spell out ASALT, which is the initial approach fix for 13L and 13R The pilot was then landed over to the tower controller and was cleared to land on runway 13L, and he read back those instructions correctly In the meantime, a Turkish Airlines Boeing 787-9 was cleared to line up and wait on runway 13R, the parallel runway to 13L, on the opposite side of the airport At that point, the tower controller (yes, it’s *that* guy, though he’s really calm here, so it’s hard to tell) was about to clear the Turkish Airlines plane for takeoff, but you could hear someone in the background in the tower saying “don’t do it, Viva lined up for 13R” In the meantime the Viva A321neo lined up for runway 13R and got as low as 500 feet, before the pilot called a go around From there, the Viva A321neo shot a similar approach, which was successful. Then the pilot was given landing clearance again, and I got a good chuckle out of how the controller emphasized how they were cleared to land on “runway 13 *LEFT*.” As you’d expect, once on the ground, the pilots got a number to call, for a possible pilot deviation. This incident was super embarrassing and concerning The first thing that stood out to me about this interaction is how incredibly calm all the JFK controllers remained. Often they’ll go from zero to 100 over a lot less, while in this case, they’re just like “meh.” So kudos to them for that. I was confused hearing that one controller not raising his voice, for once. As far as these Viva pilots go… what on earth was going on here? I’m not suggesting they’re bad at flying planes, but they’re certainly not good at preparing for approaches, including to some of the busiest airspace in the country. Individual mistakes happen, but this just comes down to unpreparedness, as they obviously hadn’t briefed the approach. For those who may not appreciate how simple the instructions were, they were given the RNAV Z approach for runway 13L, and were told to fly direct ASALT. If they had been looking at the map (which they should’ve), they would’ve seen the initial fix for this is ASALT. That didn’t come out of left field, and that’s an instruction they should’ve been expecting. Instead, that caused a ton of confusion… how?! As a result, the communication was really poor, with the pilots only partially reading things back, and then following up way too late to ask things to be spelled out. As you can see in the above video, the approach for runway 13L and 13R is incredibly challenging, given the last minute turn it involves. So to see them attempt that approach and then line up with the wrong runway is really bad. Also, there are some situations where you can sort of understand how someone may end up approaching the wrong runway. This approach shouldn’t be one of these. It’s not like 13L and 13R are right next to one another — quite to the contrary, all the terminals are between the two runways, so there are a lot of visual clues, and they’re quite far apart. I’m not sure if this comes down to a training issue at the airline, two very indifferent pilots being paired together, or what. Going back a few years, a Viva plane attempted to take off from a taxiway at Chicago O’Hare Airport (ORD), in what can only be described as another strange incident for the carrier. A Viva Airbus A321neo approached JFK with two pilots who were clearly unprepared. They couldn’t follow basic instructions, acted as if the initial fix for their planned approach was gibberish, and then tried to land on the wrong runway. All the while, JFK controllers remained rather calm, which is a rare treat. https://onemileatatime.com/news/unprepared-viva-pilots-approach-jfk-land-occupied-runway/ Delta Air Lines Apologizes After Flight 2150 Diverts To Atlanta: Pilots Wearing Oxygen Masks On The Flight Deck The last couple of days have been exhausting for Delta Air Lines. To start the week, Delta saw a complete ground stop issued by the Federal Aviation Administration for its flights out of Detroit Metro Airport. The ground stop lasting more than two hours was only for Delta flights, taking place in the morning. Delta saw other issues this past weekend, as cancellations piled up at its primary hub, Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. Northeast weather issues led to delays, and "crew duty time was exhausted," according to Delta, resulting in more cancellations. At Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, Delta was forced to divert a flight to its primary hub. Flight attendants reported an issue on flight 2150, prompting the airline to make an emergency landing before reaching its destination. Oxygen masks were released for the pilots. Here's a closer look at what took place and how Delta Air Lines reacted to the incident on its Boeing 737-900ER with 111 passengers. A Delta Air Lines Spokesperson Confirmed Flight 2150 Was Diverted Due To An Odor On Board On Tuesday afternoon, Delta Air Lines was forced to divert flight 2150 due to an onboard issue. According to a Delta spokesperson, the flight was traveling between Miami and Minneapolis. Ultimately, the flight made an emergency landing at Delta's main hub, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Delta mentioned that the pilots were wearing oxygen masks during the landing, citing it as standard procedure. “As a standard procedure, pilots donned oxygen masks in the flight deck; no customer oxygen masks were deployed." Injuries or illnesses were not reported. The Boeing 737-900ER carried six crew members and 111 passengers on the domestic flight. Delta apologized for the incident and was working on a new flight for affected passengers. “Delta’s flight crew followed their extensive training to safely divert to Atlanta after an odor was detected onboard. We apologize to our customers for the experience and the delay in their travels.” This isn't the first time a major U.S. airline has grounded a flight this year due to an odor in the cabin. There have been such incidents multiple times before. For Delta, it has been a tough week, especially due to the weather in the northeast. The issues have caused more delays for Delta at some of its major hubs. Delta Air Lines Faced Other Issues With Miami Flights Last Week To start the week, delays and cancellations at Boston Logan International Airport increased. That continued into Tuesday, as BOS had the most flight cancellations worldwide, both departing and arriving. Additionally, the airport saw 151 delays for departing flights and 138 delays for arrivals. This also affected Delta Air Lines' flights last week, particularly for a flight to Miami. According to CBS News, one passenger was stuck with no options after all flights to Miami from Boston were canceled. "Delta has canceled both flights to Miami and can't do anything for us." To reach their destination, the family of five flew to Atlanta and then drove nine hours overnight to Miami, hoping they would still make it in time for their cruise. Cancellations have been a recurring issue for Delta over the last couple of weeks. However, yesterday, the airline finally managed to bring its total down compared to earlier in the week and last week. Delta Air Lines Cut Down Its Cancellation Totals On Tuesday Cancellations increased over the last couple of days for Delta. On Sunday, the airline had by far the most cancellations worldwide with 302, according to FlightAware. It was the same story for Delta on Monday, as it once again finished the day with the most cancellations at 147. However, it was a better day for Delta on Tuesday. The airline finished the day with 24 cancellations, which was its lowest number in recent days. T The airline also had 921 flight delays, behind Southwest Airlines and American Airlines. Most Flight Delays On December 30: 1. Southwest Airlines — 1,336 2. American Airlines — 937 3. Delta Air Lines — 921 4. SkyWest — 639 5. United Airlines — 637 Early Wednesday morning, Delta's flight cancellations were once again low, at just three, along with 40 delays. These numbers should increase throughout the day, but are not expected to reach the totals from this past weekend. https://www.thetravel.com/delta-air-lines-apologizes-flight-2150-diverts-pilots-wearing-oxygen-masks-atlanta-miami-minneapolis/ Air India 787 Pilots Operated 5 Flights with Snags, DGCA Issues Notice Regulator questions Air India over dispatching flights despite repeated snags and MEL restrictions. DELHI- Tata Group-owned Air India (AI) has received a show cause notice from India’s aviation regulator after operating flights between Delhi (DEL) and Tokyo Haneda (HND) despite repeated technical snags. The DGCA said crews operating Air India (AI) flights AI358 and AI357 accepted the aircraft with prior awareness of system degradation and MEL restrictions. DGCA Issues Notice to Air India Amid Violation According to the DGCA notice dated December 29, the operating crew accepted the aircraft without fully understanding the Minimum Equipment List (MEL) limits and system interdependence. MEL compliance is a mandatory element of the Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR). The regulator said repetitive snags linked to the same systems had been recorded across five earlier sectors, which indicated known and ongoing system degradation before the Delhi-Tokyo flights. The DGCA cited a specific case of non-compliance on June 28, 2025, linked to MEL O conditions involving the lower right recirculation fan on AI358. The regulator said the crew did not properly assess the combined operational and safety effects of multiple inoperative systems, as required under CAR. Notices have been issued to both Air India and the involved pilots, Business Today reported. Repeated Technical Snags Raised Safety Risk The regulator’s review showed that faults affecting the same systems had been reported multiple times. The aircraft was still dispatched despite this known history. This raised concerns over operational judgement, risk assessment, and adherence to structured maintenance and dispatch controls. CAR requires that flight crews evaluate how multiple issues might interact to increase risk. The DGCA said this duty of assessment was not carried out to the required standard and that MEL provisions appeared to be applied without sufficient consideration of linked system performance. Air India and the flight crew members have been given 14 days to respond. Based on these responses, DGCA will decide on enforcement under the Aircraft Rules and CAR. The review forms part of a wider focus on operational discipline and regulatory oversight. The regulator’s notice comes while an investigation continues into the Air India AI171 crash at Ahmedabad involving a Boeing 787 on June 12, which resulted in 260 fatalities. That investigation remains ongoing and has further sharpened scrutiny of airline safety practices. Expert Remarks Aviation safety expert Amit Singh, who leads Safety Matters Foundation, said the incident reflects deeper safety culture issues rather than isolated crew decisions. He pointed to repeated dispatch despite known technical defects, reliance on paperwork over risk-based assessment, and a trend of blaming pilots when aircraft continue operating with unresolved snags. He warned that when safety failures become routine, accidents no longer come as a surprise. Similar Incident Air India Airbus A320 operated eight domestic flights after its airworthiness certificate expired. The aircraft was grounded once the lapse was detected, and the regulator opened a formal investigation into compliance failures. Airworthiness lapse under regulatory review The incident concerns a 164-seat Airbus A320 that continued commercial service after its Certificate of Airworthiness expired. Engineers identified the oversight only after the aircraft completed eight sectors on November 24 and 25. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) began a detailed inquiry to understand how the aircraft was dispatched without a valid certificate in place. The certificate requires annual renewal following periodic maintenance and safety checks. Operating any aircraft without a valid certification is treated as a major violation under Indian aviation law. Air India suspended all staff linked to the technical release of the aircraft and grounded the jet pending investigation. The airline also notified the DGCA and initiated its own internal review. Details not yet disclosed publicly Public reports have not identified the aircraft registration, the flight numbers, or the specific routes involved. Passenger loads and operational impacts have also not been disclosed. There is no indication of any safety incident during the affected flights, but the absence of valid certification is considered a serious breach in itself. The airline’s Continuing Airworthiness Management systems are designed to track renewal schedules and compliance tasks. Aviation experts note that missing a certificate renewal is rare in such systems, which raises questions about internal quality controls and procedural discipline. Possible penalties and operational impact Authorities may impose penalties if negligence or systemic weaknesses are confirmed. These may include fines and suspension of accountable personnel responsible for engineering oversight and operational control. The lapse could also expose the airline to risk with lessors and insurers, since non-compliant operation can affect insurance coverage terms. Regulators continue to perform random audits, but responsibility for continuous airworthiness rests with the operator at all times. Government officials have described the lapse as a serious failure that compromised the assurance of flight safety, even though flights operated without incident. https://aviationa2z.com/index.php/2025/12/31/air-india-787-pilots-operated-flights-with-snags-dgca/ Latest deep-sea search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 gets underway A deep-sea search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has begun in the Indian Ocean, reviving efforts to solve one of aviation’s greatest mysteries HANOI, Vietnam -- A deep-sea search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 began in the Indian Ocean on Wednesday, reviving efforts to solve one of aviation’s greatest mysteries more than a decade after the jet vanished with 239 people on board. Malaysia’s Transport Ministry said Wednesday that a search vessel, the Armada 86 05, arrived at a designated search area with two autonomous underwater vehicles. The location of the search area was not disclosed in the statement. It said the vessel had prepared for the search in Fremantle Port in Western Australia. The government did not specifically mention Ocean Infinity, the company that helmed a previous search and had long been slated to lead the new one. But the craft that the government specified by number has been widely identified by maritime and aviation websites as belonging to Ocean Infinity. Earlier in December, the Malaysian government said that the Texas-based marine robotics firm would begin searching targeted areas of the seabed under a renewed “no-find, no-fee” agreement. Ocean Infinity has confirmed it was resuming the search for MH370 but refused to comment further, citing the “important and sensitive nature” of the operation. Ocean Infinity previously searched the seabed in 2018, under a similar contract but found no trace of the plane. The company has said it has since upgraded its technology and refined its analysis. Its CEO Oliver Plunkett said last year the firm was working with multiple experts and had narrowed the search zone to what it believes is the most probable crash site. Earlier this year, Ocean Infinity briefly restarted seabed search operations in a new 15,000-square-kilometer (5,800-square-mile) area of the southern Indian Ocean after receiving approval from Malaysia, but the effort was suspended in April because of poor weather. The Malaysia Airlines plane disappeared from radar shortly after taking off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing on March 8, 2014. Satellite data later showed the aircraft veered from its planned route and flew south toward the remote southern Indian Ocean, where investigators believe it crashed. There has never been an explanation for the course change. A costly and protracted multinational search effort failed to locate the aircraft, though pieces of debris believed to be from the plane later washed up along the East Africa coast and on Indian Ocean islands. No main wreckage or bodies have ever been recovered. https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/latest-deep-sea-search-missing-malaysia-airlines-flight-128801273 Netherlands Tightens Aviation Safety at Amsterdam Schiphol as Alcohol Screening Removes Flight Crew, Impacting European and Transatlantic Travel At Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) in the Netherlands, aviation safety procedures were reinforced when routine alcohol screening resulted in the removal of flight crew members from duty, highlighting the country’s strict regulatory approach to protecting passengers and sustaining confidence in European air travel. The incident, which involved a pilot and a cabin crew member, was managed under established Dutch aviation law and underscored the importance of zero-tolerance policies for alcohol consumption before flight operations. These checks, carried out by national authorities, play a crucial role in safeguarding the reputation of the Netherlands as a major global aviation and tourism hub. With Schiphol serving as a key gateway connecting Europe with destinations across the United States and beyond, such enforcement actions carry significant implications for international travelers. The event also reaffirmed the European Union’s commitment to uniform safety standards across member states. Through consistent monitoring and enforcement, the Netherlands continues to prioritize passenger trust, operational integrity, and the seamless flow of tourism, ensuring that safety remains central to every journey passing through one of Europe’s busiest airports. Routine Alcohol Screening at Amsterdam Schiphol At Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, a comprehensive alcohol screening operation was conducted by the Aviation Supervision Team in coordination with the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee. During this operation, a total of 212 cockpit and cabin crew members were screened as part of standard safety oversight. The checks were carried out in line with Dutch aviation regulations, which mandate strict limits on alcohol consumption for aviation personnel. Such screenings are routinely performed to ensure that all crew members are fully fit for duty before participating in flight operations. By applying these measures consistently, the Netherlands reinforces its position as a leader in aviation safety within Europe and supports the smooth functioning of travel and tourism through one of the continent’s most important airports. Cabin Crew Member Exceeds Legal Alcohol Limit During the screening process, a cabin crew member from an undisclosed airline was found to have exceeded the legal blood alcohol limit of 0.2 percent permitted for aviation personnel in the Netherlands. As a result, the individual was immediately removed from flight operations. The Public Prosecution Service subsequently issued a fine of 1,100 euros and imposed a five-hour flight ban. These measures were applied in accordance with national aviation law, which prioritizes preventive action over punitive escalation when no additional criminal offenses are involved. The swift response ensured that passenger safety was not compromised and that scheduled travel disruptions were minimized, preserving the reliability of services operating through Amsterdam Schiphol. Pilot Removed Despite Remaining Below Threshold In the same screening operation, a pilot was found to have consumed alcohol but remained below the legally defined limit. Despite this, Dutch aviation safety rules required that the pilot be removed from operational duties. A one-hour flight ban was issued by authorities, and the airline concerned took the additional step of removing the pilot from duty for the remainder of the day. This decision reflected the Netherlands’ precautionary approach to aviation safety, where even marginal risks are addressed to maintain public confidence. By enforcing such standards, authorities demonstrated a commitment to protecting the integrity of air travel, particularly at a hub that plays a vital role in European and transatlantic tourism. Ten-Hour Rule Reinforces Safety Culture Dutch aviation law strictly prohibits pilots and cabin crew from consuming alcohol within ten hours of a scheduled flight. This rule is designed to eliminate any residual effects of alcohol that could impair performance. The enforcement of this regulation at Amsterdam Schiphol serves as a reminder of the high expectations placed on aviation professionals operating in the Netherlands. For travelers, especially those connecting through Schiphol to destinations across Europe and the United States, such measures provide reassurance that safety remains paramount. The rule also aligns with broader European Union standards, ensuring consistency across member states and supporting the smooth movement of tourists and business travelers alike. Airline Identity Withheld Under Standard Procedure Authorities chose not to disclose the identity of the airline employing the affected crew members. This decision followed standard procedure in cases where administrative penalties are imposed without further criminal charges. By adhering to established protocols, Dutch authorities balanced transparency with fairness, while maintaining focus on safety outcomes rather than reputational consequences. This approach supports a stable aviation environment, encouraging airlines operating in the Netherlands to cooperate fully with regulatory oversight. For the travel and tourism sector, such practices help maintain trust without causing unnecessary disruption to airline operations or passenger confidence. Broader Context of Aviation Safety in the Netherlands Routine alcohol screenings are conducted across airports throughout the Netherlands as part of a broader strategy to uphold aviation safety. These checks apply to both domestic and foreign airlines, reflecting the country’s role as a major international aviation gateway. Amsterdam Schiphol, in particular, handles millions of passengers annually, many of whom are tourists traveling between Europe and long-haul destinations such as the United States. By enforcing strict compliance among flight crew, Dutch authorities contribute to a secure travel environment that benefits passengers, airlines, and the wider tourism economy. Reference to a Similar Incident Involving Delta Air Lines A comparable incident occurred in November 2024 when Delta Air Lines faced a significant safety issue at Amsterdam Schiphol. Two flight attendants scheduled to operate flight DL49 from Amsterdam to New York John F. Kennedy Airport in the United States failed alcohol breath tests conducted by Dutch police. Both individuals were immediately removed from duty and arrested, and Delta Air Lines suspended them pending internal investigations. The incident highlighted the effectiveness of Dutch screening measures and their application to foreign carriers operating within the Netherlands. Enforcement Actions and Operational Continuity In the Delta Air Lines case, the female flight attendant recorded a blood alcohol level of 1.43 grams per liter, significantly exceeding the European regulatory limit, while the male attendant measured slightly above the threshold. Fines were issued accordingly, and both were detained before being released. Despite the last-minute removal of crew members, Delta Air Lines successfully reorganized staffing to ensure that the flight departed with only a short delay and arrived in New York ahead of schedule. This outcome demonstrated how robust safety enforcement can coexist with operational resilience, minimizing disruption to international travel and tourism. European Oversight and International Implications European regulators mandate strict alcohol limits for all aviation personnel, and random screening is required across European Union member states. Since 2021, the Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft program has expanded to include random alcohol checks for foreign airlines operating into Europe. This initiative ensures that international carriers adhere to the same standards as European operators. For travelers moving between Europe, the Netherlands, and destinations such as the United States, these measures enhance confidence in the safety and reliability of air travel. Strengthening Passenger Trust and Tourism Confidence The enforcement actions at Amsterdam Schiphol underscore the Netherlands’ commitment to maintaining high safety standards in aviation. By applying regulations consistently and transparently, authorities support a secure environment for passengers and airlines alike. For the global travel and tourism industry, such measures are essential in sustaining trust, encouraging international travel, and protecting the reputation of major hubs like Schiphol. As air travel continues to connect cultures and economies, the Netherlands’ proactive approach serves as a model for balancing safety, efficiency, and passenger confidence. https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/netherlands-tightens-aviation-safety-at-amsterdam-schiphol-as-alcohol-screening-removes-flight-crew-impacting-european-and-transatlantic-travel/#google_vignette CALENDAR OF EVENTS . Singapore Airshow 2026 - FEBRUARY 3-6, 2026. . VERTICON 2026 - Atlanta March 9-12 . 60th Annual SMU Air Law Symposium - March 31 - April 1, 2026 (Irving, TX) . 2026 ACSF Safety Symposium; April 7-9, 2026; ERAU Daytona Beach, FL . 2026 NBAA Maintenance Conference; May 5-7, 2026; New Orleans, LA . BASS 2026 - 71st Business Aviation Safety Summit - May 5-6, 2026 | Provo, Utah . The African Aviation Safety & Operations Summit - May 19-20 | Johannesburg, South Africa . Safeskies Australia - Australia’s renowned Aviation Safety Conference - Canberra Australia 20 and 21 May 2026 . IATA World Maintenance & Engineering Symposium (23-25 June, Madrid, Spain) . ISASI - 2026 (September/October 2026) - Dubai, UAE . 2026 NBAA Business Aviation Convention & Exhibition (NBAA-BACE) Oct. 20-22, 2026 | Las Vegas, NV Curt Lewis